Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Washington: You are Go for Sequestration

Sequestration. It's all over the news. Essentially the definition is, "If Congress cannot agree on ways to cut back the total (or does not pass a new, higher Budget Resolution), then an 'automatic' form of spending cutback takes place. This automatic spending cut is what is called sequestration."

In reality it's yet another example of what an economic mess we're in and government's total and absolute inability to do anything about it.

If both the Executive and Legislative Branches can't act like grownups it all kicks in March 1. 

A lot of folks are saying "The Sky is Falling!" Get real. If this whole thing was such a big deal the President wouldn't have gone golfing with Tiger and Congress wouldn't have gone home to shake hands and raise money for their next campaigns. This is all about politics. The folks with the "Bully Pulpit" are bullies themselves. And they're picking on us.

So let the spending cuts fall where they may. While I strongly disagree the sky will fall, if indeed it does maybe it's exactly the "Wake-up" call government needs to get serious about dealing with a $67.7 Trillion deficit.

A couple of guys who came up with a solution to this mess, and were promptly ignored by the very government who asked them to do it in the first place, are Al Simpson and Erskine Bowles.

Here's a basic outline of their original ideas:
  • Replace the current tax bracket system of 10/15/25/28/33/35/39.6 with three brackets: 12%, 22%, and a maximum of 28%.
  • Permanently repeal the AMT, the PEP phase-out of personal exemptions, and the PEASE limitation on overall itemized deductions.
  • Eliminate all tax deductions; require taxpayers to take the standard deduction.
  • Keep the earned income and child tax credits.
  • Replace the mortgage interest deduction with a 12% non-refundable tax credit. Creditable mortgage balance would be capped at $500,000 (maximum credit $60,000); no credit for second residence.
  • Replace the charitable contribution deduction with a 12% non-refundable tax credit, subject to a 2% of adjusted gross income floor.
  • Treat state and local bond interest as taxable.
  • Tax all capital gains and dividends at ordinary rates
In other words, if we're really serious about all this we'll need to do more than raise Warren Buffet's taxes.

 Never the type to give up Simpson and Bowles now recommend at the very least, trying this:

"Reform the Tax Code in a Progressive and Pro-Growth Manner. The current tax code is complicated, confusing, costly, anti-growth, anti-competitive, unfair, and riddled with well over $1 trillion of tax expenditures – which really are just spending by another name. Tax reform must reduce the size and number of tax expenditures to reduce the budget deficit and lower marginal tax rates for individuals and corporations. At the same time, tax reforms must maintain or improve the progressivity in the tax code and promote economic growth. Tax reform will make the tax code more efficient, effective, and globally competitive.:

The tax code is 70-thousand pages long, just one of the reasons Facebook is getting a $428 Million tax refund this year. How do you "Like" that?

Such foolishness, so avoidable, so very, very sad for all of us.

So maybe it's just as well Sequestration happens. As the Beatles sang, "Let it be."

Brian Olson
Owner/Consultant
Conversation Starters Public Relations
"We start the conversation about you"

Monday, January 24, 2011

Format Change for SOTU?

"He shall from time to time give to Congress information of the State of the Union and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient."-Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution.



Tomorrow night President Obama delivers the annual State of the Union address, which will be referred to as SOTU moving on. It's the ultimate bully pulpit and used very well by Presidents from both parties over the years. What it really has become is predictable. At this time of a Presidency it's essentially a re-election speech. Again, both parties equally guilty.

After the speech, which is interrupted way too many times by scripted pauses and applause lines, a representative of the "Loyal Opposition" delivers the "Response" from some room, somewhere.

I think we'd all be better served if at the very least, the opposing party delivered its remarks right there in the House, simply taking the podium after the President speaks. Following that, the President would then be offered the opportunity for a rebuttal. Not a debate, but an exchange of thoughts and ideas.

Better yet would be something akin to "Question Time" in the British Parliament. Members of Parliament ask questions directly of the Prime Minister and it can get quite raucous. But it's a great and very entertaining exchange of political thought.

Better yet, why not questions submitted via Twitter and Facebook from, gasp, real citizens?

Who knows, SOTU could end up with better ratings than the Super Bowl. Just a thought.

Brian Olson
Conversation Starters Public Relations
"We start the conversation about you"

Monday, September 27, 2010

Absolute Zero.

Did you know there's a limit to how cold it can get? Scientists say the maximum lowest temperature possible is -459ยบ Fahrenheit. It's known as "Absolute zero."

Congress has reached the political equivalent. Last Friday Stephen Colbert testified before a congressional committee about immigration. Why he was there had both Republican and Democrats scratching their heads. For the record, Colbert was invited by Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren.

Members of both parties say the Comedy Central Star's appearance was a mockery of Congress. Actually, Congress made a mockery of itself. Please don't confuse this with any partisan politics. Both parties have had a hand in bringing the once august body to its lowest approval ratings ever. Almost near zero. Absolute zero.

Congressional hearings cost $100,000 per hour. It would have been far cheaper to have everyone watch Colbert on their office televisions. It would have been far more productive for our elected "representatives" to spend time on more pressing issues.

Brian Olson
Conversation Starters LLC
"We start the conversation about you"

Friday, September 17, 2010

BEVO Blog: Austin Weekend

Last weekend we had the good fortune to be in Austin, TX for the home opener between the 'Horns and the Pokes. Texas won 34-7 but it was the weekend itself that was most memorable. From cupcakes on Congress to meeting old friends in the Oval at the LBJ Library to eating mass amounts of "Q at the Salt Lick, it was a grand weekend.

Being a firm believer that a picture is worth often times more than a thousand words, here's a look back at a wonderful time.



Root for your team this weekend and HOOK'EM!

Brian Olson
Conversation Starters LLC
"We start the conversation about you"

Friday, June 4, 2010

The Business of Journalism should be just that.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." -1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

There's a little (but dangerous) initiative flying just below the radar screen in Washington which should trouble us all. Government is trying to "Re-invent" Journalism. It's a line they should not, and must not cross.

Here's just one article about it all, but in a nutshell here's what government wants to do to "fix" what ain't broken.

-Establishing news vouchers for citizens to support non-profit journalism. i.e. Public Broadcasting.
-A 5% sales tax on consumer electronics to pay for even more government owned broadcasting.
-A "News" Division of Americorps

Commercial broadcasters and print outlets are going through tough times. But they don't need "help" from the government. They'll figure it out. The founding fathers of this nation realized that a free, unfettered and INDEPENDENT press was critical to the success of the nation and our freedoms guaranteed by the 1st Amendment.

Please don't confuse this with an anti-government rant. (Although if you want to, that's fine too.) We need government to fix potholes etc, but not to fix journalism. I spent 20 years in the craft, including serving on the Board of Directors of the Radio-Television-Digital News Association which represents the interests of journalists. Our patron saint is Ed Murrow. Walter Cronkite sitteth at his right hand.

Anything, and I mean anything that somehow casts doubt, or restricts the ability of a free and open media to ask the tough questions, and then to report to us the answers, is a dangerous step towards erosion of our freedom of independent thought and exchange of ideas and opinions.

This also isn't against Public Broadcasting. Donate during their telethons, please. But I want a choice besides Public Radio and Television. You have your favorite news outlets, and so do I. They often may differ but the common theme we must embrace and protect is choice.

I have far too many good friends in journalism who work their rear-ends off to inform us. The last thing I want is for their stories to be approved by the government prior to air. Or to be charged a sales tax on a new television to pay for it.

Freedom starts with a free media. This "initiative" could be the beginning of the end of a free and open media.

Brian Olson
CEO and Founder
Conversation Starters LLC